text

This text was written in response to an invitation to write the experience of a series of connected events taking place on the Muntplein, Brussels on October 9-10. We were asked to attend and respond to a dictum of ‘non-documentation’ / ‘non-mapping’.

‘Non-Documentation’ walks a precipice to becoming simply ‘Alternative-Documentation’.
‘Non-Mapping’ walks a precipice to becoming simply ‘Alternative-Mapping’.

This writing is to be as close as possible to experience not occurring.

In writing this text we have tried to be as serious about its non-documentation as possible. So much so that the text has been written before the event, with little recourse to its planning, and is published online prior to the even taking place. In this way, we make clear that our ‘experience’ of the event is absent from this text entirely. The text writes its own indifference and redundancy to the writing of experience.

The writing itself is processual. It derives from the opening three paragraphs of Jürgen Habermas’ The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (1962), but any other text may serve equally well. The writing has been altered via a practice of textual co-cannibalism – feeding Habermas’ original sentences back into each other via sequences of manual dictation, stenography, auto-correct, and repetition. These sequences generate the text as proteins form together to produce growths.

The redundancy of the writing is its structuring principal.

In wanting to reassert locality, how can we think past the necessity of physical presence? Experience in/and attendant body never present: “An locality” swooning emergent public sphere. Once dreamed is the action action of events.

We conclude this preamble by making ourselves animal in the animal face of reading.

The usage of the word public and public sphere betrays the public multiplicity to origins going back to various historical phrases
And when applied synchronically
And when applied to the social welfare state
They infuse the social welfare state.
Not-just-ordinary-words include the science jargons, particularly jurisprudence
Words do not seem capable or prudent of replacing traditional categories like public and privates

With the application of empirical research it dissolved into something elusive.

We call these vents and occasions public when they are open to all
In the term ‘excessive public building’, the building does not need to be houses for public traffic.
State institutions as traffic.
As such they are public.

As a critical judge, it is what makes the judgement character of meaningful courts.
The public sphere itself is aimed at producing such publicity.
Sometimes the public appears simply as that sector of the private that happens to be opposed to the circumstances.
Either the organ of the state, or the media like the press.
Provided communication amongst members of the public may be counted
As public organs organs.

The usage of the word public sphere betrays various
Yet the conditions that make state, they infuse the social welfare – their inherited language
Confuse their science jargon, particularly prudent, particularly jurist practice like public and privates of like public

Hate, very disciplined, is dissolved into something social.
We call the vents and occasions when they are open to all exclusive affairs to all
Or the expression of public houses the building.
The building does the expression ‘the public’ expressive
The state is the public not need to the houses of public traffic
The sword has a powerful display who is publicity on such occasions
The public occasion someone has made and retained a name for herself
(Origination of the epics of other than that of public society).

Whit the category
the category x like informed public public public size, meaning or informed expression
Publicize the subject of this public as carrier
Critical judge in the ream of mass media, of course
Originally in the realm of mass media, of course
Changed its meaning, of course
Publicly

The public sphere itself: the public domain v/s the private
That sector of the private either
The organ of the state that happens to be opposed like the press
Public organs organs
The public may be counted as public organs organs.

The usage of the word public sphere betrays variously the word public
To the multiplicity
To various historical stages of the conditioned welfare state.
Yet the conditions that make state they infuse the inherited lungs,
Appear to confuse their science jargon, particularly prudent, particularly juries practice of like privates and like public.
With thee, hate privates,
With thee is the dolmen.

Is hate very disciplined?
Nevertheless these categories, this continuous public opinion opinion.

We call the vents and occasions when they are opened exclusive affairs
Does the expression ‘the public’ express the building?
Publicity for state executions.
Is the public a state?
It, the public, not need the public of houses.
The public the word has yet its authority.
The sword and welfare has a powerful display whose publicity on such occasions is state.
On such occasions in the public occasion someone has made and refined a name for herself
Has a reputation originating in the someone.
Originating in the origination of the epics, other than that of public society.

Informed public public public size, it publicize the formed expression, the subjects of this public as carrier.
Our aim changed its meaning, a function of public opinion attribute.
The public sphere itself = the public domain as aimed at action
The public sphere = itself.
It v/s the private, that private organ of the state,
That sector of the organ of the state that happens to be opposed

Public organ organs, the public may be counted as public organs organs.

Various historical conditions betray multiplicity
The conditions that make state they infuse the confuse their science jargon,
Particularly just
The inherited longest particular
Jurist like price ant like ‘publics hate privates’
With thee is hate very disciplined and like public
With thee is the dolman

Is hate very disciplined this public opinion opinion.

We call events and occasions when they are open exclusive
In contrast to all
When they are open to all in contract to whole
The building, the building
The public not need executions!
If the public not need the public: the world, the sword, and occasion
On state in someone has made has an occasion
In the public occasion someone has made a reputation originating in the epic other than that of puck social
Originating other than that of public society.

None of these uses, however much none
None of the category x
Like informed public public public size it publicize the subject
It publicize the formed expression
It caries in the real of mass

Our aim changed in the ream of mass media
Of course our aim changed its meaning
At action it v/s the public organ
Like the the the pivot that proves organ
The state that happens to be opened public organs organs.
The public may be counted as public organs organs.

The usage of the word public sphere displays various,
The usage of the word public sphere betrays.
Historical welfare state make welfare stage and make state.
They infuse the confuse the conditions that make state,
Their science jargon particularly just,
The inherited longest particular
Like publics hate privates.
Like privates hate publics
Like publics hate publics hate privates.
With thee is hate very disciplined and like public
With thee is the dolmen.
Is hate very disciplined.

We call events and occasions when they are opened exclusive
In contrast to when they call to all and are open to all.

In contrast to all the building, the building.

Does the expression the public for state not need executions?
Not need executions if the public not need the public, the words, the sword, and occasion.
The public is need
The public in sword in reason in the world
And in welfare station such occasion.
The puck social social
Originating puck social social
Other than that of public society society.

It formed expressions
It carry us in the ream of mass
It publicize in the real of mass.
Our aim changed its meaning, that puck domain as aimed at action.
Aimed at the public sphere itself.
It aimed at the public organ,
It v/s the public organ like thee thee thee private
That opened proven organ that happens to be opened
Public organs organs may be counted as pubic organs organs.

The usage of the word displays various of the usage of the page of the word
Multiplicity applied multiple historical
Make welfare stage and make state conditions historical
They confuse the infuse, their science just
The infuse confuse that science jargon
Is hate very like pucks with thee?
Is hate very hate vary disciplined very disciplines.

We call events and occasion when they call to all and are open to all and call events and occasions when they are not in contrast
The building the building
Not need executions, not need contrast to all the buildings.
The public not need the sword
The public is need
The public not need

The public, the words, the sword, the occasion
The public in the world in sword such occasions
In welfare state in someone
Such occasion in someone has world the welfare
Puck social social other than that originating puck other

That that of public society society.

None of these uses however much none of the category x
None of the none of the category x
Like informed public public public size, it carious in the ream of mass
It pucks in there
Ram of mass media
Of course our media changed
It publicize our aim
Our aim changed its meaning –
aimed at the public sphere itself and v/s the the the private that happens though the open proved public organ
Thrice the the the open proven organ

The page displays the usage of the word
Make state, make state conditions historical, and make state.
They confuse and infuse their science.
Their conditions historical, the ‘R’ science just, their science jargon, unlike dolmen is hate.
The inherited golden puck is various very disciplined.
Pucks with thee as hate.

We can events and occasions when they call to all and call and call to all and are open to all when they are not, in contrast, the building the building.

Not need executions.
Not need contrast to the building.
Not need the sword.
No need no tree execution of the words the sword.

The public is need.
The public is not need
The public is the world is need.

Someone has the world.
Such occasion and someone has world.

None of these uses.
Much none of the category x.
None of the None of the None.
Publish from the category x.
It publish from there, like informed public public public size.

Our media change, it publicize our aims.
Out media rams its aims,
Out aim changed its meaning.
Thought the open proved organ thrice:
like proven public organs like proven public organs like proven public organs.

Slow Reading Club

Slow Reading Club (SRC) is a semi-fictional reading group initiated by Bryana Fritz and Henry Andersen in late 2016. The group deals in constructed situations for collective reading. SRC looks at, probes, and interrupts ‘readership’ as a way to stimulate the contact zones between reader and text, text and text, reader and reader. SRC does not aim at deconstruction or even comprehension of the texts in hands, but at the production of a kind of excess: to temporarily suspend criticality for intimacy and to negotiate agencies with the text. 
 

Slow Reading Club premiered at kunstenfestivaldesarts 2017, in Brussels as part of an evening titled Before the Codes. Since then they have presented work in a number of performance, art, and discursive contexts: How Do Buildings Care? (La Loge, Brussels) Bâtard Festival 2017 (Beursschouwburg, Brussels & Veem House for Performance, Amsterdam), Whose Organs Were Those of a Leopard (Louise Dany, Oslo), and Reframing the House of Dust (CalArts, California). The group is currently in residence with the Art by Translation postgraduate program. They split their time between Brussels and its various elsewheres.